Guatay Christian Fellowship v. County of San Diego

Good Law
670 F.3d 957·2011 WL 6450742·2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 25581
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 201109-56541California16,938 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hawkins, J.

The Guatay Christian Fellowship (“Church”) appeals the adverse grant of summary judgment on the Church’s claim that San Diego County (“County”) enforced a land use regulation in violation of the Church’s constitutional and statutory rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 2000ec (“RLUIPA”). The district court determined the Church’s constitutional and statutory claims were not ripe for review because the Church failed to apply for the required land use permit both during the twenty-two years it inhabited the property prior to enforcement efforts and after the district court ordered it to do so as a condition of proceeding with its suit. The district court also rejected the Church’s claim that equitable estoppel should apply to bar the County’s enforcement efforts. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and affirm.

1. BACKGROUND

The history of the property and of the dispute between the Church and the County is lengthy, but necessary to our analysis. We summarize the most salient points here.

A. Facts

1. The Church

The Church was founded by Pastor Stan Peterson and his wife Brenda in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.