Donald Linaman v. Jack Palmer

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 201109-16961California271 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 23 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DONALD LINAMAN, No. 09-16961

Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:08-cv-00364-LRH

v.

MEMORANDUM *

JACK PALMER; ATTORNEY

GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF

NEVADA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2011**

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Nevada state prisoner Donald Linaman appeals from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as untimely and

unexhausted. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Linaman contends that the district court erred when it found that his petition

was untimely and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.