Donald Linaman v. Jack Palmer
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 201109-16961California271 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 23 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DONALD LINAMAN, No. 09-16961
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:08-cv-00364-LRH
v.
MEMORANDUM *
JACK PALMER; ATTORNEY
GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF
NEVADA,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 19, 2011**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Nevada state prisoner Donald Linaman appeals from the district court’s
judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as untimely and
unexhausted. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Linaman contends that the district court erred when it found that his petition
was untimely and…