United States v. Santiago Valle-Dominguez
463 F. App'x 700
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 201110-10541California262 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 23 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-10541
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:10-cr-00534-JMR
v.
MEMORANDUM *
SANTIAGO VALLE-DOMINGUEZ,
a.k.a. Santiago Ramirez-Valle,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Marvin E. Aspen, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 19, 2011 **
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Santiago Valle-Dominguez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 41-
month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Valle-Dominguez’s counsel
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion…