United States v. Virgil Grant, III
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 201116-1173California250 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 23 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50181
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00600-SVW
v.
MEMORANDUM *
VIRGIL EDWARD GRANT, III,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 19, 2011 **
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Virgil Edward Grant, III, appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and
72-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute 100 or more kilograms of
marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. Pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Grant’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). no grounds for relief, along with a…