United States v. Virgil Grant, III

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 201116-1173California250 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 23 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50181

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00600-SVW

v.

MEMORANDUM *

VIRGIL EDWARD GRANT, III,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2011 **

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Virgil Edward Grant, III, appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and

72-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute 100 or more kilograms of

marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. Pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Grant’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). no grounds for relief, along with a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.