Steele

Steele v. Holder

Good Law
464 F. App'x 638
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 30, 201107-74463California292 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Nathaniel Rory Steele, a native and citizen of South Africa, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo questions of law, Hamazaspyan v. Holder, 590 F.3d 744, 747 (9th Cir.2009). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The agency properly found Steele ineligible for cancellation of removal based upon his 1994 conviction for an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43)(B). See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(3); Rendon v. Mukasey, 520 F.3d 967, 976 (9th Cir.2008) (conviction for possession of marijuana for sale is categorically an “aggravated felony” under 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43)(B)); see also Becker v. Gonzales, 473 F.3d 1000, 1002-04 (9th Cir.2007) (upholding retroactive application of the expanded “aggravated felony” definition under Illegal Immigration and Immigrant Responsibility Act, Pub.L. No. 104-208, § 321 , 110 Stat. 3009 (1996)).

The agency also properly found that Steele could not apply for both cancellation of removal and a waiver under former section 212(c). See 8 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.