United States v. Fidel Diaz-Lemus

Good Law
464 F. App'x 650
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 30, 201111-10002California129 words

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Fidel Diaz-Lemus appeals from the 12-month sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Diaz-Lemus contends that the district court failed to consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a) factors in imposing the consecutive 12-month sentence, and that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The district court did not procedurally err and Diaz-Lemus’ within-Guidelines sentence is reasonable in light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a) sentencing factors. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 , 128 S.Ct. 586 , 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3(a)(l), (f).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.