Jaswinder Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
465 F. App'x 612
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 4, 201209-73626California357 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Jaswinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the new standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act, Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir.2010), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination based on Singh’s admission that he filed a false Canadian asylum application, see Singh v. Holder, 638 F.3d 1264, 1272 (9th Cir.2011) (“[L]ies and fraudulent documents when they are no longer necessary for the immediate escape from persecution do support an adverse inference.”), and multiple unexplained inconsistencies in the record regarding significant aspects of his claim, including his wife’s beating by police, his father’s 2006 arrest, and the number of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.