United States v. Mayra Martinez-Parra

Good Law
465 F. App'x 633
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 5, 201211-10109California117 words

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Mayra Martinez-Parra appeals from the 27-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for escape, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751 (a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Martinez-Parra contends that her fully consecutive sentence is substantively unreasonable. The consecutive sentence is consistent with the Guidelines. See U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(a). In light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a) sentencing factors, the sentence is substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 , 128 S.Ct. 586 , 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.