Traci Hepler v. California Reconveyance Compan
Opinion
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Traci K. Hepler appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in her action arising out of foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo. Olsen v. Idaho State Bd. of Med., 363 F.3d 916 , 922 (9th Cir.2004) (summary judgment); Ramirez v. Fox Television Station, Inc., 998 F.2d 743, 747 (9th Cir.1993) (denial of motion to remand to state court). We affirm.
The district court properly granted summary judgment to Washington Mutual Bank and California Reconveyance Company for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed on November 4, 2008.
The district court properly granted summary judgment to Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed on April 17, 2009.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by striking the claims against Washington Mutual in Hepler’s third amended complaint because Hepler filed it after the district court had entered judgment in favor of Washington Mutual on Hepler’s second amended complaint. See Weeks v. Bayer, 246 F.3d 1231, 1236 (9th Cir.2001) (judgment must be reopened before plaintiff can amend complaint); see also…