Bonneau

Bonneau v. Centennial School District No. 28J

Good Law
666 F.3d 577·2012 WL 75554·2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 547
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 11, 201210-36070California1,501 words

Opinion

Opinion

McKEOWN, J.

In the wake of concerns about delayed reporting of child abuse, Oregon, like a number of states, adopted a special statute of limitations for abuse victims. Under the Oregon statute, an action must be commenced before the person reaches age 40 or within five years of discovery of the causal connection between the abuse and the injury. Or.Rev.Stat. § 12.117(1). The question we consider is the effect of this statute on Ryan Bonneau’s federal civil rights claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . In affirming the district court’s dismissal of the action as time barred, we conclude that Oregon’s general statute of limitations, rather than the specialized abuse statute, governs Bonneau’s claims, and that federal, not state, law governs accrual of his claims.

Analysis

Bonneau, age 34 at the time he filed this action, alleges that while he was an elementary school student from 1986 to 1988, he was beaten by teachers at the school. Defendants include the teachers, his then-school principal, and the school district (collectively, “the District”). Bonneau claims he experienced physical and emotional injuries at the time of the alleged beatings.

The district court dismissed Bonneau’s action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.