Ccsf

McInerney v. City & County of San Francisco

Good Law
466 F. App'x 571
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 12, 201210-16864California901 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Joseph Mclnerney timely appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, which arose from his arrest for trespassing at the LeNain hotel. The district court granted summary judgment to defendants Cox, Spain, and the City and County of San Francisco. It dismissed with prejudice the claims against defendants Buckley, Fong, and Stuwe. It dismissed without prejudice Mclnerney’s state law claims, and his claims against unserved defendants Tides Center, Dish, Hughes, and Gary. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Mclnerney contends that the district court improperly excluded evidence of an unlawful search of his backpack, but he does not identify — and we could not locate — any motion seeking to offer that evidence, nor any order excluding it. Because this contention was not accompanied by sufficient reasons or argument, we deem it waived. See Fed. R.App. P. 28(a)(9)(A); Katie A., ex rel. Ludin v. L.A. Cnty., 481 F.3d 1150 , 1161 n. 21 (9th Cir.2007).

Mclnerney contends that the district court should not have required him to show excusable neglect for his failure to serve some of the defendants. We review a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.