Eva Jimenez-Sandoval v. Merrick Garland
Opinion
Opinion
Rawlinson, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EVA ANGELINA JIMENEZ- No. 19-73193
SANDOVAL,
Petitioner, Agency No.
A072-991-558
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney OPINION General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 2, 2021* San Francisco, California
Filed January 13, 2022
Before: Johnnie B. Rawlinson and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges, and Kathleen Cardone,** District Judge.
Opinion by Judge Rawlinson
* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). ** The Honorable Kathleen Cardone, United States District Judge for the Western District of Texas, sitting by designation. JIMENEZ-SANDOVAL V. GARLAND
SUMMARY***
Immigration
Denying Eva Jimenez-Sandoval’s petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals that denied her motion to reopen an in absentia deportation order, the panel rejected Jimenez-Sandoval’s contention that, because she was actually a minor when she was released on her own recognizance without notice of…