Willie Edwards v. Ben Curry

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 19, 201218-56662California249 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 19 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIE EDWARDS, No. 09-16589

Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 4:08-cv-01923-CAW

v.

MEMORANDUM *

BEN CURRY, Warden; Board of Parole Hearings; ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Claudia A. Wilken, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 17, 2012 **

Before: LEAVY, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Willie Edwards appeals from the district court’s

judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Edwards contends that the Board of Prison Hearings’s 2005 decision finding

him unsuitable for parole…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.