In Re Thorpe Insulation Co.

Motor Vehicle Casualty Co. v. Thorpe Insulation Co. (In Re Thorpe Insulation Co.)

Good Law
671 F.3d 980·2012 WL 178998
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 24, 201210-56543, 10-56622California8,985 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gould, J.

The district court affirmed a bankruptcy court’s confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization under 11 U.S.C. § 524 (g), a special provision for the reorganization of companies facing substantial asbestos-related liability. Appellants are several insurance companies that did not reach settlements with Thorpe Insulation Company (Thorpe) and Pacific Insulation Company (Pacific), together the Debtors in bankruptcy court, and who were denied standing to challenge the reorganization plan. The district court held that the reorganization plan was insurance neutral, and so Appellants did not have standing to object to the plan; and it also held that the plan preempted Appellants’ state law contract rights. We affirm the district court’s conclusion that the plan preempted Appellants’ state law contract rights. We disagree with the position of Debtors that the appeal is equitably moot, and, reaching the merits, we reverse the district court’s conclusion that Appellants lacked standing. We remand to the district court with instructions that it return the case to the bankruptcy court to give Appellants the opportunity to present their proof and argument.

I.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.