Reddy v. Gilbert Medical Transcription Service, Inc.

MEMORANDUM

Krishna Reddy appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in her employment action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo a dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction, Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co., 374 F.3d 797 , 800 (9th Cir.2004), a dismissal on the basis of the applicable statute of limitations, EEOC v. Dinuba Med. Clinic, 222 F.3d 580, 584 (9th Cir. 2000), and summary judgment, Olsen v. Idaho State Bd. of Med., 363 F.3d 916 , 922 (9th Cir.2004). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed defendant Slattery for lack of personal jurisdiction because Reddy failed to establish that either general or specific personal jurisdiction existed over her. See Schwarzenegger, 374 F.3d at 800-03 (discussing requirements for a district court sitting in California to exercise personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant).

The district court properly dismissed Reddy’s Title VII claim for failure to exhaust her administrative remedies in a timely manner. See Dinuba Med. Clinic, 222 F.3d at 585 (a Title VII action cannot proceed in federal court unless a plaintiff has timely exhausted administrative remedies); see also Garcia…