Yeung

United States v. Yeung

Bad Law
672 F.3d 594·2012 WL 432289·2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 2817
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 201210-10381California5,789 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ikuta, J.

Judy Yeung appeals from a restitution order imposed by the district court after a jury convicted Yeung of various crimes associated with her involvement in a fraudulent real estate investment scheme. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We hold that the district court failed to provide an adequate explanation of its reasoning in calculating the amount of restitution owed to two of the victims and, therefore, vacate that portion of the restitution order. We remand for recalculation and explanation of the award pursuant to the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 (“MVRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3663A.

I

From 2005 until 2007, Judy Yeung and her co-conspirators developed a scheme to make money in the then-booming housing market and to pay off various debts. Yeung recruited five individuals with good credit scores to act as straw buyers to purchase and refinance residences in San Francisco and Gilroy, California. Yeung and other members of the conspiracy falsified information on the straw buyers’ loan applications, for example by materially overstating the supposed borrower’s income and assets and misstating their employment information and rental obligations. As…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.