United States v. Luis Gonzalez
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 201210-10310California443 words
Opinion
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED
FEB 13 2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-10310
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:06-cr-00710-WHA-2 Northern District of California, v. San Francisco
LUIS ALBERTO GONZALEZ,
ORDER
Defendant - Appellant.
Before: HAWKINS and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and DUFFY, District Judge.*
The Memorandum disposition, filed December 22, 2011, is amended as
follows:
On page 4, the paragraph beginning “Finally, even assuming the court” and
ending “See United States v. Warr, 530 F.3d 1152, 1163 (9th Cir. 2008).” is deleted,
and the following is substituted in its place:
Finally, the court did not violate Federal Rule of Criminal
Procedure 32 by failing to inform Gonzalez of its ex parte hearing with
Paiz’s counsel in which counsel indicated she did not plan to call
* The Honorable Kevin Thomas Duffy, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Southern New York, sitting by designation. Gonzalez because she did not think he could credibly exonerate Paiz.