United States v. Pedro Chihuahua-Rodriguez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 22, 201211-10251California241 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 22 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10251

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:10-cr-01715-FJM-

v.

MEMORANDUM *

PEDRO CHIHUAHUA-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Frederick J. Martone, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2012 **

Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Pedro Chihuahua-Rodriguez appeals his conviction by guilty plea and

sentence for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a),

with a sentencing enhancement pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Chihuahua-

Rodriguez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.