Marlowe Brown v. U.S. District Court

MEMORANDUM

California state prisoner Marlowe Brown appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as untimely. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 , and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the habeas petition as untimely, as it was filed after the one-year statutory limitations period had ended. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (d); Banjo v. Ayers, 614 F.3d 964, 967-69 (9th Cir.2010).

We construe appellant’s additional arguments as a motion to expand the certificate of appealability. So construed, the motion is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 22 — 1(e); Hiivala v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.