United States v. Hector Mendoza-Valdez
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 22, 201211-30155California253 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 22 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-30155
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 1:09-cr-00206-EJL-
v.
MEMORANDUM *
HECTOR MENDOZA-VALDEZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho Edward J. Lodge, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 21, 2012 **
Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Hector Mendoza-Valdez appeals his conviction by guilty plea and sentence
for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Mendoza-Valdez’s counsel has filed a
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw
as counsel of record. We have provided…