United States v. Israel Flores-Rodriguez

Good Law
468 F. App'x 800
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 201208-50107California234 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 23 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-50107

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:04-cr-02061-BTM

v.

MEMORANDUM *

ISRAEL FLORES-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Barry T. Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2012 **

Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Israel Flores-Rodriguez appeals from the district court’s order denying his

motion to dismiss the indictment. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), Flores-Rodriguez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds

for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). provided the appellant with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.