United States v. Joshua Meech

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 14, 202221-30025California1,480 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JAN 14 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30025

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:20-cr-00013-DLC-1 v. 2:20-cr-00013-DLC

JOSHUA RODNEY MEECH,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Dana L. Christensen, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 6, 2021 Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Joshua Meech appeals his conviction and sentence for making a false

statement during a firearms transaction, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6). We

have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1 Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we recite only those facts necessary to decide this appeal. 1. Meech argues: (1) that his indictment was defective because it failed to

specify what…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.