United States v. Barry Gilton

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 14, 202220-10269California1,585 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 20-10269, 20-10344

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:13-cr-00764-WHO-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

BARRY GILTON, a.k.a. PRELL,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William H. Orrick, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 17, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: WATFORD and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN,** District Judge.

From an early age, Barry Gilton had a passion for basketball. As he grew

older, he decided he wanted to use this passion to give back to his community—

San Francisco’s Fillmore district. Barry thus took a job as the recreational director

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Edward R. Korman, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

1 at Fillmore’s Ella Hill Hutch…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.