Shainie Lindsey v. City of Pasadena

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 14, 202220-56093California936 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JAN 14 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHAINIE LINDSEY, No. 20-56093

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:16-cv-08602-SJO-RAO and

SHENIA ELDRIDGE, Guardian ad Litem MEMORANDUM* for RT3 and RT4; DOMINIQUE KEATON, Guardian ad Litem for DT; ANNIE HARRIS, for the Estate of Reginald Thomas,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF PASADENA; PHILLIP

SANCHEZ; JEFFREY NEWLEN;

THOMAS BUTLER; ROBERT

GRIFFITH; MICHAEL OROSCO;

PHILLIP POIRIER; RAFAEL

SANTIAGO; AARON VILLACANA;

SUSAN GOMEZ,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 11, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges, and BLOCK,*** District Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Shainie Lindsey et al. (Appellants) appeal from the

district court’s order denying Appellants’ motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.