Ramon Olvera v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 14, 202220-55957California1,497 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAMON OLVERA, No. 20-55957

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-06157-RGK-SK v.

QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, INC., a business MEMORANDUM* entity; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 18, 2021 Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN and FORREST, Circuit Judges, and AMON,** District Judge.

After Quest Diagnostics (“Quest”) fired Ramon Olvera (“Olvera”) from his

courier position, he sued claiming his termination was based on his age.

Specifically, he alleged: (1) age discrimination in violation of California’s Fair

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Carol Bagley Amon, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. Employment and Housing Act…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.