Zamora

People v. Zamora

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 2022G059259California2,379 words

Opinion

Opinion

Goethals, J.

FACTS

This is the second appeal arising from the trial court’s denial of Zamora’s motion for disclosure of juror identifying information and alleged sentencing errors. Because neither issue relates to the convictions themselves, we incorporate the brief summary of facts underlying Zamora’s convictions from our prior opinion. “Zamora’s charges were based on three separate incidents involving the same victim, J. Hernandez. In the first incident, Zamora and Hernandez were drinking together and got into a fist fight. During the fight, Zamora threatened Hernandez with a gun and unsuccessfully attempted to force Hernandez into his car; Hernandez escaped. “The second incident occurred a few months later, when Hernandez was driving and Zamora walked into the street and began shooting at him, with several bullets hitting Hernandez’s car. Hernandez crashed and took off running but Zamora followed him and told him to get into his car. Hernandez agreed, and the two of them spent the rest of the day together. Later that evening, Zamora threatened to kill Hernandez. “The third incident occurred a few weeks later when Zamora went to Hernandez’s house and threatened to hurt Hernandez or his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.