Derrick Young v. United States
22 F.4th 1115
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 18, 202220-71740California5,029 words
Opinion
Opinion
Berman, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DERRICK YOUNG, No. 20-71740 Applicant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
THOMAS LEWIS, No. 20-71741 Applicant,
v. OPINION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
Application to File Second or Successive Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Argued and Submitted October 20, 2021 San Francisco, California
Filed January 18, 2022 Before: Bridget S. Bade and Patrick J. Bumatay, Circuit Judges, and Richard M. Berman, District Judge. *
Opinion by Judge Berman
SUMMARY **
Second or Successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motions
The panel denied Thomas Lewis’s and Derrick Young’s consolidated applications for permission to file second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motions in which they sought principally to be allowed to present their claim that armed bank robbery is not a predicate crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) in light of United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019), which held that the “residual clause” definition of “crime of violence” in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutionally vague.