Sanchez

Sanchez v. Westlake Services

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 2022B308435California2,939 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/18/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

JOSEFINA CEJA SANCHEZ, B308435

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC713468) v.

WESTLAKE SERVICES, LLC,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Stuart M. Rice, Judge. Dismissed. Rosner, Barry & Babbitt, Hallen D. Rosner and Arlyn L. Escalante for Plaintiff and Appellant. Madison Law, Jenos Firouznam-Heidari, James S. Sifers and Brett K. Wiseman for Defendant and Respondent.

_________________________________ After Josefina Ceja Sanchez and Westlake Services, LLC settled Sanchez’s lawsuit under the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) (Civ. Code, § 1750 et seq.), Sanchez moved for attorney fees, costs and prejudgment interest pursuant to the terms of their agreement. The trial court denied the motion for attorney fees but awarded Sanchez costs and prejudgment interest. Without first dismissing the lawsuit or requesting entry of a judgment, Sanchez appealed the order denying attorney fees. We dismiss the appeal as taken from a nonappealable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.