In re Malik T.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 2022B311135California7,396 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/18/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

In re MALIK T. et al., Persons B311135 Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. CK79785A-G)

LOS ANGELES COUNTY

DEPARTMENT OF

CHILDREN AND FAMILY

SERVICES,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

SHAILYN A.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Tamara Hall, Judge. Reversed and remanded. Marsha F. Levine, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Rodrigo Castro-Silva, County Counsel, Kim Nemoy, Assistant County Counsel, and Jessica S. Mitchell for Plaintiff and Respondent. __________________________ Eighteen months after the juvenile court terminated her family reunification services and set the matter for a selection and implementation hearing, Shailyn A. petitioned pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 3881 for an additional six months of reunification services with her children. Although the juvenile court found Shailyn had demonstrated changed circumstances, the first step of the section 388…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.