In re King CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 2022C093956California12,229 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/18/22 In re King CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yolo) ----

In re ANTHONY LOUIS KING, C093956

On Habeas Corpus. (Super. Ct. No. HC202040)

Petitioner Anthony Louis King appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging Governor Gavin Newsom’s Penal Code1 section 3041.2 decision to reverse the Board of Parole Hearings’ (Board) grant of parole. The Governor reversed the Board’s decision because, in his view, petitioner “is still not able to articulate a deep understanding of the causative factors of the crime, and has not yet developed the tools to avoid turning to his dependent behavior.” We conclude the Governor’s reversal lacks “some evidence” upon which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.