Ergur

Ergur v. Trowbridge CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 2022A163845California1,864 words

Opinion

Opinion

Petrou, J.

Filed 1/18/22 Ergur v. Trowbridge CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

KORAY ERGUR,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A163845

v. JEFFERY D. TROWBRIDGE, (San Francisco City & County Super. Ct. No. CGC-21-592041) Defendant and Respondent.

Koray Ergur, appearing in propria persona, sued Jeffery Trowbridge with a 252-page complaint seeking $13.5 quadrillion in damages for a series of alleged conspiracies and crimes Trowbridge and his family committed over the course of human history. Trowbridge, an attorney who had some years earlier secured the dismissal of a complaint Ergur brought against Trowbridge’s clients, moved to dismiss Ergur’s complaint as a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP). After the trial court granted the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.