Tom

Tom v. Live Nation Entertainment CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 2022B308200California5,092 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feuer, J.

Filed 1/19/22 Tom v. Live Nation Entertainment CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

TERRY TOM et al., B308200

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC665696) v.

LIVE NATION

ENTERTAINMENT, INC. et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, H. Jay Ford III, Judge. Affirmed. Minami Tamaki, B. Mark Fong and Seema Bhatt; Emergent and Seth I. Rosenberg for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, Alexander Giannetto and John Paul Salem for Defendants and Respondents.

__________________________ The 24-year-old son of Terry and Gayline Tom died after ingesting ecstasy at a dance music festival. The Toms brought an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.