Paul Cousin v. Cynthia Tompkins
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 19, 202220-55840California2,848 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 19 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PAUL EUGENE COUSIN, No. 20-55840
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:16-cv-00254-CAS-MRW v.
CYNTHIA TAMPKINS, Warden, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted November 17, 2021 Pasadena, California
Before: WARDLAW, PARKER,** and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge PARKER
Paul Cousin appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254
petition for habeas corpus, which asserted ineffective assistance of trial counsel
and actual innocence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Barrington D. Parker, Jr., United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, sitting by designation. 2253, and we…