Christopher Lull v. County of Sacramento

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 19 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHRISTOPHER LULL; AUTOTEK, INC., No. 20-16599

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:16-cv-01093-KJM-CKD v.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 14, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: WALLACE and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and LASNIK,*** District Judge. Plaintiffs Christopher Lull and his smog-check company, Autotek, brought

claims for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that the County of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.…