Marshall

Marshall v. Buchanan

Good Law
1 Cal. Dist. Ct. 151
California District CourtJuly 15, 1857California61 words

Lead Opinion

Hager, J.

did not tMnk the application addressed itself to favorable consideration on the ground on which it was presented. Reference to the affidavits filed showed a discrepancy as to the facts, and did not disclose sufficient cause to open the judgment; those in support of the motion being equivocal, and that on the part of the plaintiff positive in averments.

Motion denied.