People v. Petrovich CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 2022G059834California925 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS

We incorporate by reference the detailed summary of facts set forth in Guillen, supra, 227 Cal.App.4th 934. Simply stated, in 2011 a jury convicted Petrovich of second degree murder (§ 187, subd. (a)), and the trial court sentenced him to 15 years to life in prison. In April 2019, Petrovich filed a petition to vacate his murder conviction and for resentencing under section 1170.95. The petition alleged as follows: “[1] A complaint, information or indictment was filed against me that allowed the prosecution to proceed under a theory of felony murder or murder under the natural and probable consequences doctrine; [¶] [2] At trial, I was convicted of 1st or 2nd degree murder pursuant to the felony murder rule or the natural and probable consequences doctrine; . . . [¶] [3] I could not now be convicted of 1st or 2nd degree murder because of changes

1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code.

2 made to . . . §§ 188 and 189, effective January 1, 2019[;] [¶] . . . [¶] [and 4] I request that this court appoint counsel for me during this re-sentencing process.”

The trial court appointed counsel and held a hearing at which it denied Petrovich’s petition for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.