Thompson

Thompson v. City of Pasadena CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 2022B302316California7,072 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/20/22 Thompson v. City of Pasadena CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

RICHARD THOMPSON, B302316

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC668717) v.

CITY OF PASADENA,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEALS from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Lia Martin, Judge. Affirmed. McNicolas & McNicholas, Patrick McNicholas, Michael J. Kent; Esner, Chang & Boyer and Andrew Chang for Plaintiff and Appellant. Gutierrez, Preciado & House, Calvin House; Michele Beal Bagneris, City Attorney, and Javan Rad, Chief Assistant City Attorney, for Defendant and Appellant. ______________________ Richard Thompson sued the City of Pasadena for retaliation in violation of the Fair…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.