United States v. Chun Tong

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 20, 202220-10011California444 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 20 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10011

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:18-cr-00082-JMS-1 v.

CHUN MEI TONG, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii J. Michael Seabright, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 18, 2022** Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, MILLER, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Chun Mei Tong appeals the restitution order entered as part of her criminal

sentence for wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and aggravated identify

theft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Tong’s conviction was based on a scheme in which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.