United States v. Chun Tong
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 20, 202220-10011California444 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 20 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10011
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:18-cr-00082-JMS-1 v.
CHUN MEI TONG, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii J. Michael Seabright, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 18, 2022** Honolulu, Hawaii
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, MILLER, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Chun Mei Tong appeals the restitution order entered as part of her criminal
sentence for wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and aggravated identify
theft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291, and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Tong’s conviction was based on a scheme in which…