Ramon Perez v. Giselle Matteson
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 20, 202219-16471California878 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 20 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RAMON ORTIZ PEREZ, No. 19-16471
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-06398-RS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
GISELLE MATTESON,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Richard Seeborg, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted January 14, 2022** San Francisco, California
Before: GOULD, NGUYEN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.
Ramon Ortiz Perez appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his
petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253. Reviewing the denial of habeas relief de novo,
see Walden v. Shinn, 990 F.3d 1183, 1188 (9th Cir. 2021), we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1. Ortiz Perez fails…