Jonah Martinez v. Alex Villanueva

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 20, 202220-56233California558 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 20 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JONAH MARTINEZ; et al., No. 20-56233

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-02874-AB-SK v.

ALEX VILLANUEVA; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Andre Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 18, 2021 Pasadena, California

Before: KLEINFELD, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges. Concurrence by Judge KLEINFELD

Appellants appeal from the district court’s grant of a motion for judgment on

the pleadings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse and

remand for further proceedings consistent with this disposition.

We resolve this case for the reasons set forth in McDougall v. County of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1 The parties are familiar with the facts, so we discuss them here only as necessary.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.