Haywood

People v. Haywood

Good Law
198 Cal. Rptr. 3d 40·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 1168·243 Cal. App. 4th 515
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 30, 2015C078609California3,234 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Butz, J.

In January 2015, defendant Pharaoh Haywood filed a petition in propria persona pursuant to Penal Code section 1170.18 1 (enacted as part of a Nov. 2014 initiative measure) to redesignate his 1996 felony conviction for unlawful taking or driving of a vehicle (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a) ) as a misdemeanor. 2 He waived personal appearance if the matter was not contested. The trial court, acting ex parte, appointed a public defender. It then summarily denied the petition in a minute order "due to ineligibility based due to: [c]urrent [sic] conviction(s)." 3 Defendant appealed. (Cf. Teal v. Superior Court (2014) 60 Cal.4th 595 , 597, 179 Cal.Rptr.3d 365 , 336 P.3d 686 [§ 1170.126 eligibility is appealable].)

Defendant argues that even if unlawful taking/driving of a vehicle is not expressly included among the offenses "in accordance with" which he can be resentenced *43 to a misdemeanor (§ 1170.18, subd. (a) ), it can constitute a "theft conviction" ( People v. Garza (2005) 35 Cal.4th 866 , 881, 28 Cal.Rptr.3d 335 , 111 P.3d 310 [when committed as theft conviction, § 654 precludes court from imposing punishment for offense in addition to punishment for a conviction under § 496,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.