Root

People v. Root

Good Law
199 Cal. Rptr. 3d 516·2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 160·245 Cal. App. 4th 353
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 1, 2016D068235California2,682 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Huffman, J.

*355 This appeal arises from David Michael Root's petition to reduce certain second degree burglary convictions to misdemeanors pursuant to Proposition 47, the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act (Pen.Code, 1 § 1170.18 ). The burglary convictions involve incidents in which Root entered banks, during regular business hours, for the purpose of cashing forged checks in amounts less than $950.

Although the precise issue in dispute has been somewhat of a moving target in the trial court and in the briefing in this court, it now appears the question presented here is whether entry into a bank to commit theft by false pretenses in amounts under $950 qualifies as "shoplifting" under newly enacted section 459.5. We conclude that proper application of statutes and case law compels us to conclude such crimes fit within the shoplifting offense, as now defined, and therefore Root's petition for relief must be granted.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 2008, Root was convicted of multiple theft, forgery and burglary offenses.

*356 In May 2015, Root filed a petition to reduce various theft, forgery and burglary offenses to misdemeanors. The court granted the requests with the exception of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.