T.H.

T.H. v. Novartis Pharm. Corp.

Good Law
199 Cal. Rptr. 3d 768·2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 179·245 Cal. App. 4th 589
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 9, 2016D067839California7,208 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McConnell, J.

INTRODUCTION

*594 May Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (Novartis), a former manufacturer of a brand-name asthma medication, be liable in negligence for neurological injuries allegedly sustained by twin minors in utero after their mother was prescribed and consumed a generic form of the medication nearly six years after Novartis sold its interests in the medication?

The minors allege Novartis knew or should have known physicians prescribed its asthma medication to pregnant women for the off-label purpose of preventing or inhibiting preterm labor. They allege studies available to Novartis before it sold the rights to its brand-name product in 2001 showed the drug was not effective for tocolysis (inhibiting preterm labor ), it could cross the placenta, and it could interfere with fetal development. The minors more clearly contend on appeal Novartis had a duty to revise the label warnings while it still owned the drug to indicate a risk to fetal development and its failure to do so contributed to their injuries years later.

We conclude the minors have demonstrated they can amend their complaint to state a claim under California law for negligent failure to warn and negligent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.