Cal. Cannabis Coal. v. City of Upland

Good Law
199 Cal. Rptr. 3d 805·2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 208·245 Cal. App. 4th 970
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 18, 2016E063664California7,837 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Codrington, J.

I

INTRODUCTION

*974 Petitioner California Cannabis Coalition, a California nonprofit corporation, and Nicole De La Rosa and James Velez (collectively, CCC), appeal judgment entered after the trial court denied CCC's petition for writ of mandate (writ petition). CCC's writ petition requested the trial court to order the City of Upland and city clerk, Stephanie Mendenhall, (collectively, the City) to hold a special election on CCC's medical marijuana dispensary initiative (Initiative).

CCC contends the trial court erred in ruling CCC's Initiative could not be voted on during a special election under Article XIIIC (Article 13C), section 2 of the California Constitution, because the Initiative imposes a charge on medical marijuana dispensaries, which in effect is a general tax rather than a regulatory fee. CCC objects to the trial court requiring the Initiative to be placed on the next general election ballot, instead of presenting it to the voters earlier by holding a special election. CCC further argues the City council prematurely determined, before the election on the Initiative, that the Initiative constituted a tax rather than a regulatory fee.

CCC requests this court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.