Mejia

People v. Mejia

Good Law
2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 1019·211 Cal. Rptr. 3d 112·5 Cal. App. 5th 1190
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 22, 2016E062962California3,799 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McKinster, J.

Defendant and appellant Philip Raymond Mejia appeals his conviction for torture, spousal rape, spousal abuse, and criminal threats. We reject his contention that the court should have conducted a hearing pursuant to People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118 , 84 Cal.Rptr. 156 , 465 P.2d 44 ( Marsden ) based on defendant's statements during a hearing on his request to represent himself and his contentions concerning the improper admission of evidence. We agree, however, that the trial court erred in imposing an unstayed sentence on count 3. Accordingly, we will remand the matter with directions to stay imposition of that sentence.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Defendant was charged with one count of torture (Pen. Code, § 206 ; count 1); 1 one count of spousal rape with tying and binding *114 (§ 262, subd. (a)(1); count 2); one count of corporal injury to a spouse (§ 273.5, subd. (a); count 3); and one count of criminal threats (§ 422; count 4). As to all four counts, the information alleged that defendant administered methamphetamine to the victim in the commission of the offenses.

A jury returned guilty verdicts on all four counts. It found the allegation of tying and binding true, but found…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.