Cuiriz

People v. Cuiriz

Good Law
2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 116·213 Cal. Rptr. 3d 723·8 Cal. App. 5th 744·2017 WL 587993
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 2017A144351California6,280 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Pollak, J.

*746 Defendant Deyanira Cuiriz appeals a judgment sentencing her to imprisonment for 27 years to life following her conviction for attempted voluntary manslaughter, shooting at an occupied vehicle and mayhem. She contends that she did not voluntarily and knowingly waive her right to remain silent when she spoke to the police after having been advised of her rights under Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 ( Miranda ), and that the trial court erred in admitting her statements made during the police interrogation and in refusing to excise from the evidence presented to the jury a statement by the interrogating detective. She also contends the sentence imposed constitutes constitutionally prohibited cruel and unusual punishment. We shall affirm the conviction but conclude this is the rare case in which there is merit to defendant's constitutional challenge to the sentence imposed.

Background

The record contains extensive testimony from numerous witnesses describing the incident that culminated in the shooting that rendered the victim a quadriplegic. However, a detailed recitation of the evidence is unnecessary in view of the issues raised on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.