Presley

People v. Presley

Good Law
2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 117·214 Cal. Rptr. 3d 85·8 Cal. App. 5th 617·2017 WL 587176
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 2017H041651California6,353 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Premo, J.

Defendant Ecclesiastes Presley appeals from an order revoking his outpatient status pursuant to Penal Code section 1608 1 and directing his confinement in a state hospital.

Presley argues the trial court: (1) unlawfully deprived him of his right to have a jury decide his commitment status; (2) violated his due process rights by holding the hearings on revoking his outpatient status in his absence; (3) erred by considering inadmissible testimony from his treating psychologist; and (4) revoking his outpatient status without substantial evidence to support its decision.

Though we agree that Presley was improperly deprived of a jury trial, his absconding from outpatient treatment before the trial court ruled on his commitment status forfeited the claim of error. We find no merit to Presley's remaining arguments and will affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Presley, who has been certified as a mentally disordered offender (MDO), 2 was placed into an outpatient conditional release program (CONREP) by court order in August 2013. He was initially housed at a board and care facility, where he was subject to weekly drug screening, group therapy, and individual counseling. After…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.