Vandiver

People v. Vandiver

Good Law
2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 167·214 Cal. Rptr. 3d 655·9 Cal. App. 5th 152·2017 WL 767005
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 2017E065899California3,019 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Slough, J.

In this appeal, the parties ask us to determine the value of a blank check for the purpose of distinguishing between misdemeanor and felony receiving stolen property after passage of the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act (Proposition 47).

Respondent, Angela Kay Vandiver, pled guilty in 2012 to a single felony count of receiving stolen property based on her possession of blank checks she knew had been stolen. She later petitioned to have the conviction redesignated a misdemeanor under the new provisions of Proposition 47 on the ground the checks were worth $950 or less. (Pen. Code, § 1170.18.) The People opposed, arguing the balance of the victim's checking account was greater than $950. The trial court found the value of the blank checks to be de minimis and granted the petition.

The People contend the court erred by (i) reaching the merits because Vandiver did not attach evidence of value to her petition and (ii) determining the checks' value was de minimis. They contend the court should have dismissed the petition as unsupported or found the checks were worth the full amount in the linked checking account and denied the petition on the merits. We affirm.

I

FACTUAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.