Zamudio

People v. Zamudio

Bad Law
12 Cal. App. 5th 8·2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 484·218 Cal. Rptr. 3d 543·2017 WL 2061433
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 15, 2017B271406California3,013 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Perluss, J.

*11 After overruling Raymond Zamudio's demurrer to the petition for revocation of parole filed by the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office and denying his motion for an assessment whether imposition of intermediate sanctions would be appropriate, the superior court found Zamudio in violation of the conditions of his parole, revoked parole and ordered it restored after Zamudio had served 150 days in county jail. On appeal Zamudio contends *546 the ability of a district attorney to petition for revocation of parole without first completing certain procedural steps and including in the petition information required when a revocation petition has been filed by the supervising parole agency violates his and other parolees' right to equal protection of the law under the state and federal constitutions. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The facts in this case are undisputed. On September 4, 2013 Zamudio was convicted of making a criminal threat (Pen. Code, § 422 ) 1 and sentenced to a two-year state prison term. On April 29, 2014 he was released on parole.

On January 16, 2016 Zamudio assaulted the mother of his children. One month later the district attorney's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.