Dicarlo

Dicarlo v. Cnty. of Monterey

Good Law
12 Cal. App. 5th 468·2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 513·218 Cal. Rptr. 3d 829·2017 WL 2417409
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 24, 2017H041400California8,094 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Bamattremanoukian, J.

*472 I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant County of Monterey entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Monterey County Deputy Sheriffs Association (Sheriffs Association). The terms of the MOU included a longevity performance stipend that provided that a member of the Sheriffs Association who achieved 20 years of service with the County of Monterey and a satisfactory or outstanding performance evaluation could receive an additional stipend of up to eight percent. Plaintiffs are members of the Sheriffs Association who either received the longevity performance stipend prior to their retirement, are currently receiving the longevity performance stipend, or anticipate receiving it in the future.

Plaintiffs brought the instant action against the County of Monterey and its Board of Supervisors (hereafter collectively *831 the County), the County of Monterey Sheriff's Office (Sheriff's Department) 1 and individual defendants, and also against defendants California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) and CalPERS's Board of Administration. Plaintiffs sought peremptory writs of mandamus to compel the County to report the longevity performance stipend to CalPERS as an item of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.